Tarot Research — Open Data from 1,370 AI Readings
Anonymized statistics from 1,370 readings by approximately 750 unique participants (69 registered users plus anonymous guests by IP). January–May 2026.
Methodology, dataset, and analysis — open under CC BY-SA 4.0. No mystical claims, just statistics and honest limitations.
AI Tarot vs Human Reader — A Data Analysis
Human readers cost $50-150 per session. AI tarot costs $0.001 in compute. The price gap is 50,000x. The quality gap is unknown — nobody runs controlled tests. Here's what 1,370 AI readings tell us about consistency, retention, and where AI fails predictably.
Are Tarot Readings Accurate? What 1,370 Real Draws Show
We analyzed 1,370 AI tarot readings from approximately 750 unique participants. The accuracy question is the wrong one — here's what the data can and can't tell us about whether tarot 'works.'
Open Dataset — 1,370 AI Tarot Readings
Download our anonymized tarot reading dataset under CC BY-SA 4.0. Statistical breakdowns, methodology, citation format. Updated quarterly.
Research Methodology — How We Collect and Analyze Tarot Data
Transparent documentation of our data collection process, anonymization, AI provider attribution, sample limitations, and update cadence. n=1,370 readings, 69 users, 7 languages.
Most Drawn Tarot Cards (1,370 Readings Analyzed)
We logged 1,370 AI tarot readings. Knight of Wands appeared 78 times — more than any other card. The Hanged Man dominated the Major Arcana. The math says random. Here's what the data actually shows.
What People Actually Ask Tarot — 1,261 Question Analysis
We analyzed 1,261 tarot questions submitted to AI readings. 28.1% asked about the future. 13.4% about love. Only 1% about money. Here's what people genuinely turn to tarot for — and what they don't.
Cite or contribute
Quarterly snapshots. Open methodology. Add your reading to the next dataset by trying a free reading.